|
|
WintersSong Fuzzy Wuzzy 1417 Posts <blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by kyro298</i> <br />I guess my question is if people are donating money AND paying adoption fees for them, how do we know what's left to be covered? I haven't seen the vet's info in case people want to donate directly either. That doesn't mean I haven't missed it somewhere. There are A LOT of threads about this. I'm not trying to start anything...I just know people are asking these questions and no one is saying it out loud. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> I would donate if there were a way to donate directly to the vet. Catman Goose Catcher CO, USA 2670 Posts <blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by WintersSong</i> <br /><blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by kyro298</i> <br />I guess my question is if people are donating money AND paying adoption fees for them, how do we know what's left to be covered? I haven't seen the vet's info in case people want to donate directly either. That doesn't mean I haven't missed it somewhere. There are A LOT of threads about this. I'm not trying to start anything...I just know people are asking these questions and no one is saying it out loud. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> I would donate if there were a way to donate directly to the vet. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> This was a suggestion a few days ago. Catman Goose Catcher CO, USA 2670 Posts <blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by valkyriemome</i> <br />Actually, I haven't been following this too closely - but I am aware of the post saying there is an on-going USDA investigation. I am aware of Lori saying that she is cooperating with that investigation, and cannot divulge any information that would jeopardize that. <blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by TheHomermomma</i> <br />I know that everyone here is very eager to know this ex-breeder's name and to keep an eye out to be sure that she does not breed again. However, there is an active USDA investigation that I am cooperating with right now and I cannot give you that information. When this is wrapped up and is public I will give you the information. I'm not hiding her...I just want to make sure that I do not impede this investigation. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> Alden, in the original post there was no mention of an ongoing investigation "Major Rescue Effort" - July 23 I cant post the link here because I'm writing this using my son's Wii :( DoubleBogey Fuzzy Wuzzy USA 1244 Posts I can personally confirm that the legal options were exhausted before this rescue and plan B took place. I was the one that exhausted them - until we started Plan B where Lori and I continued to explore and exhaust legal options. Further, after spending many conversations talking through our options with Ag and USDA - they even SUGGESTED and CONFIRMED the best and most effective way would be for this woman to agree to sell or surrender her gliders. There are a few reasons for this - 1) The room that they were in was SO hot (in addition to other concerns)...the overall count of gliders went from 43 to 20 in roughly 6 weeks and she had only sold 4 gliders that I was aware of during this time. I have yet to be able to figure this out completely - I can only assume they were taking care of their own dead. We needed to move MUCH more quickly than the potential MONTHS of time it would take for a regulatory agency to move the gliders. This estimate was confirmed through the agencies over the breeder's area. 2) IF we did go in and seize the gliders - there was NO legal rescue to put them except in Animal Control. In speaking with both inspectors - we agreed on the potential health detriment to gliders housed in animal control. There was also no end in sight for how long they would be there or if they would be released back to the breeder after items were cared for. Ag codes call for temps between 40-85 degrees, being over that is an infraction yet seizure will not occur without imminent danger or proof of physical harm from the infraction during inspection. Otherwise, they are given 30 days to correct. Neither of these agencies are hopping to seize animals - regardless of what the public might think or want. 3) During the inspections, there were NO dead gliders. There were infractions - but each time, she was given a period of time to correct and this would have continued. With regard to the ongoing investigation - there are different ways to investigate a breeder (think 1] safety/animal welfare 2] compliance in care and practice 3] regulatory/licensing cooperation etc.)....and there are multiple agency individuals involved when you have two entities over two states with a current colony of breeding gliders going to another state's licensed rescue. There are regulatory items that are still hanging in the air here - that were never absolved or charged upon. The animal/safety and welfare piece could only be pursued retroactively at this point. If an agency WANTED to go after this breeder with proof of illegal activity - they have a legal leg to stand on. The sell of her gliders and shut down of her practice does NOT prohibit any agency from pursuing charges and repercussions from past behaviors and operations. In addition, one state can drop off and another could pick up and run relay. Don't forget also that federal regulations transcend geographical territories. So, regardless of the gliders being out and safe - further investigation on past or different infractions CAN continue. Does this make sense? Kozi Fuzzy Wuzzy WI, USA 1278 Posts Christ, why are you out for blood? Both these ladies are explaining what they can, limited as it is. Things changed as the situitation progressed so there haven't been updates each and every day and step of the way. Honestly, they've been so busy. Lori NEVER ASKED FOR ANY DONATIONS. So why set up an account? She ALREADY explained that she isn't sure this vet will be able to take care of all of the issues and she's waiting on blood work and will figure things out after that. I think, considering Lori never asked for any money or assistance other than in finding these little ones new homes, it's entirely understandable that no account has been set up. She cares more about taking care of them than gaining back the money she's lost. She accepted in the beginning that she'd be dropping money on this and hasn't asked for anyone's help, at ALL. So let her be and if and when she chooses to ask I am SURE she'll explain and set up an account. (YES, money was asked for, but NOT by Lori or DB. It's others in the community that have been trying to help. I think everyone got a little over excited. Neither Lori nor DB have asked directly for ANY donations. So if you're wanting to bark up a tree, this is the wrong one.) Catman Goose Catcher CO, USA 2670 Posts <blockquote id="quote"><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" id="quote">quote:<hr height="1" noshade id="quote"><i>Originally posted by Kozi Gliders</i> <br />Christ, why are you out for blood? Both these ladies are explaining what they can, limited as it is. Things changed as the situitation progressed so there haven't been updates each and every day and step of the way they've been so busy. Lori NEVER ASKED FOR ANY DONATIONS. So why set up an account? She ALREADY explained that she isn't sure this vet will be able to take care of all of the issues and she's waiting on blood work and will figure things out after that. I think, considering Lori never asked for any money or assistance other than in finding these little ones new homes, it's entirely understandable that no account has been set up. She cares more about taking care of them than gaining back the money she's lost. She accepted in the beginning that she'd be dropping money on this and hasn't asked for anyone's help, at ALL. So let her be and if and when she chooses to ask I am SURE she'll explain and set up an account. <hr height="1" noshade id="quote"></font id="quote"></blockquote id="quote"> You really need to read the original post!! TheHomermomma Fuzzy Wuzzy 1332 Posts Scott, Ummmm...I DID post that. It's in the other thread. I said that I can't disclose the name of the breeder yet because I'm cooperating in a USDA investigation. According to the investigator it IS legal to buy one from someone not licensed in GA but it's not legal for them to SELL if they aren't licensed. Anyway, I'm in FL...not GA and my contract is under FL laws regardless. Remember that I didn't initiate this thread. So my posts here are simply respond...not to update. How I pay for vet bills and what vet I end up using is most definitely my choice. The bills going forward look to be possibly much more than what has gone out so far. It only makes sense to not have money tied up at a vet that I might not be using.
|
|
|
New Message |
|
. |
|