Have you all seen this? www.
.org/Beware_Glider_Chat_Rooms2.htm
kyro298 Glider Sprinkles           CO, USA 15262 Posts Also wanted to point out a few other things in the article: "This article is a must-read for anyone who is thinking about owning a Sugar Glider. It is the result of hundreds of hours of research conducted on behalf of the North American Sugar Glider Association by licensed private investigators and their agents." First of all, WHO is the North American Sugar Glider Association and what do licensed private investigators and their agents have to do with correct sugar glider information? No where does it say they are a licensed ANYTHING, who they are affiliated with (although I have a good idea), if they have any kind of credentials and they never even give documented examples of their accusations. They're angry they are being exposed for what they are-period. How dare people bash these "mill breeders" without knowing the truth. (That's sarcasm, by the way) "In several cases examined during this investigation, following the care advice provided on these various Sugar Glider chat rooms and message boards – (none of which holds a USDA License) - appears to have directly resulted in the premature death of animals. To be clear, Sugar glider chat rooms and message boards are an “online community” which is not held to ANY standards of truthfulness, accuracy, or bias; and they cannot be considered a source of reliable information regarding the feeding and care of Sugar Gliders" Ok, I'll bite...what are the examples? Proof? Just also wondering if this so-calledorganization is "held to ANY standards of truthfulness, accuracy, or bias" and how do we know they are a source of any reliable information? They have hundreds of hours into studying gliders? So do I! LOL They use terms like "for example", "in many instances" and "in one case", "the following is an example". Well, WHAT instance? What case? Who? Where? When? Documentation? Names? Anything? I could pay to have a website and write an article EXACTLY like this bashing and warning about fake organizations created to bash chat rooms. It's stupid. Period. Here's my favorite sentence out of the ENTIRE page: "The most common scenario was to single out a particular person or entity; (usually a Federally-licensed Sugar Glider breeding facility) – and regardless of their actual, documented record – immediately label them as a “Glider Mill”." Hmmmmmm Interesting. Edited to correct my bolding prdycool Face Hugger     USA 694 Posts LovingLife123 Fuzzy Wuzzy      USA 1069 Posts Rita Glider Sprinkles           MO, USA 12214 Posts
Some photos from our members Rita Glider Sprinkles           MO, USA 12214 Posts Edited: I have removed the link to the site I had posted here. They have deleted the two paragraphs on the site that were pertinent to this thread. LovingLife123 Fuzzy Wuzzy      USA 1069 Posts That is too funny,what are those people thinking? I cant believe people would believe that stuff. What does www.terrispettingzoo.com have to do with that article? imthisperson Glider   WI, USA 108 Posts I think that this article is really proving sometimes the best offense is a great defense. For me the entire tone was bitter and defensive. It just strengthens my belief that you have to be very selective on what you read, and trust, on the internet. With the web being completely uncensored and neutral like it is, anyone can say anything and find at least a handful of people to back them up. I am with Kyro on this one...WHERE ARE THEIR SOURCES?! I would like to know the names of the investigators, I would like to know when they researched the glider mills, that they do not call glider mills, and I want the name, number, and address of the veterinarian they spoke to. Like Jett said, these forums aren't always completely correct, but they provide an immense jumping off point for new owners, and for people who need emergency advice. Sometimes people aren't confident in their decisions and just need a little kick in the pants. These sites provide that. I don't understand how being part of a community has all of a sudden become a bad thing to people who are honest, caring, and really do want the best for their gliders. devinkate Starting Member 5 Posts I find it amazing how poorly written everything is on this "NASGA" website. All websites for reputable organizations have some sort of "About Us" section to inform the reader of who they are and why they exist. No such thing here. On the flip side, the article is a good resource for me. I'm a teacher and work with my students on to read informational articles with a critical eye for issues with objectivity, validity and facts. They would have a field day with this one! I pulled this from their reasons not to buy a sugar glider online: " Unfortunately, in today’s “Internet Age”, anyone can put up at least a somewhat-credible looking website… copy a few things from other sites… and LOOK like an “expert”." Seems like they should listen to their own advice It's a shame "NASGA" stole pictures from Candiflip. Is there anything that can be done about this? Eric C Retired       TX, USA 2322 Posts With a bit of looking around at domain name WHOIS records, which anyone can look up, go to www.networksolutions.com/whois/index.jsp
and search if you're interested, there are 3 domains, *site banned*, isgaonline.org, and *site banned*, that were all registered with the same registrar at about the same time, 06-Feb-2007, 21-Feb-2007, 06-Feb-07 respectively. There are a LOT of different places to register a domain name on the internet. I don't think it's a coincidence that three domain names, all sugar glider related, were registered in the same place using the same company to hide registrant details, all using the same name server, and all at nearly the same time is a coincidence. There are only a handful of sugar glider websites on the internet. Such a confluence of factors is practically impossible in the context of sugar glider websites. The only logical conclusion is that these three sites have a common owner, which is Virgil Klunder of Perfect Pocket Pets. And that leads into questioning why would they register "isgaonline.org" and have it redirect to the real site at "isga.org"? If they wanted to link to the ISGA website they didn't need to register and pay for a domain name as a proxy. I think what's happening is a bit more nefarious. What they're doing is called Page Hijacking. Please feel free to read more about it en.wikipedia.org/wiki/302_Google_Jacking
Page hijacking, in a nustshell, is a way to supplant an existing website in search engines. What happens is that search engines, such as Google, will recognize that ISGA.org and isgaonline.org are the "same", and will only list one of them in the search results when people look for sugar glider websites. If Google finds many links, or high profile links, to the isgaonline site, then it may remove the ISGA website from it's search results. The trouble happens when the owner of isgaonline.org stops redirecting to ISGA.org and starts displaying their own website, essentially stealing the identity of ISGA. So, please don't ever link to isgaonline.org and don't ever click those links if you see them. With that said, I will put in place some filters for these troublesome website so that links to them don't automatically get created. I don't have any problems with people discussing them, I just don't Google or other search engines to see links from this site to theirs, that gives them credibility by association in the eyes of search engines, and I do not want that at all.
 |
New Message |
 |
. |
|